The 5 Qualities of GOOD PR Practitioners

September 7th, 2010

Yesterday while cleaning my house, my daughter was watching Kim Kardashian and all of the bizarre antics of her family.  Afterward a another show came on,”Command PR” about a celebrity public relations firm that unfortunately seems to embody the worst stereotypes of our profession–shallow, looks obsessed people chasing after headlines and celebrity endorsements for clients.  Kardashian and this firm are successful in getting attention and getting noticed.  That’s a big part of the battle but it’s not all of it.

As I watched the show the  way one watches a train wreck, I once again understand why too many people look down on PR as frivolous.  It’s unfortunate because PR at its best has the power to move people to act in positive ways–to eat better, to come together to help others, to fight injustice and to buy and use products that are of benefit to them.   What makes a good PR person?  Here is my list 5 attributes.

1) Honest – PR, better known by some as Spin, is about putting the best light on a situation, helping to portray issues, companies, organizations, in a positive way.  That doesn’t mean lying.  (If you have to lie, it’s probably not a very good product.)    A good PR person helps a client tell the truth even when it’s not so pleasant.

2) Thorough – A good PR person does their homework and has a healthy skepticism.  A good PR person checks and double checks the facts and veracity of any statement and makes sure that it can be properly sourced.  I remember once that the CEO of an organization I was working in gave a fact to a TIME magazine reporter that I had been trying to find but never could.  After the interview, I asked the CEO where he’d gotten that information and he told me he made it up.   Horrified, I called the reporter back and told her that the CEO has misstated something, that he had extrapolated based on other numbers .  It was a tough call to make–I didn’t want to embarrass my CEO but at the same time I didn’t want incorrect information out there.

3) Creative.  – A good PR person is able to connect the client’s product, idea, cause to the audiences they seek to reach.  I”ll never forget a clever campaign that came across my desk when I was a reporter.  It was for a roach killer and they pitched it as birth control for roaches.  It was funny and original and we covered it.  I still remember it more than 20 years later.   Another example is a campaign I was involved with around endangered historic buildings.  Instead of pitching a wonderful old Southern MD mansion as a priceless piece of architecture that might disappear, we pitched the fact that the descendant of the mansion’s owner, a slave holder, and the descendant of a slave who worked on this property were both involved trying to save this house for very different reasons.  We pitched it to a reporter at the NY Times who covered race not architecture and that coverage lead to pieces on the TODAY Show and CBS Sunday Morning and support and funding to help keep this historic treasure around for future generations.

4) Clear – A good PR person is an excellent writer and speaker who knows how to get ideas across in a variety of media.  Clear writing is clear thinking.

5) Aware – A good PR person is engaged in the world and keeps up with the news in the clients’ industries as well as current events and trends and developments within our own “industry.”  That means understanding social media and its implications.  PR’s job is to bring the outside in as well as the inside out.  We have to help our clients understand how their work fits into a larger context so that they can participate effectively in the bigger conversations that are taking place about their issues, causes or products.

To be sure the antics of Kim Kardashian and a firm like Command PR may make good television but it isn’t good PR for our profession.  What do you think? And what do you think are the qualities of good PR practitioners?

The Selective Generalist

July 30th, 2010

A few days ago, I heard presentations by Brian Solis, Deidre Breackenridge,  and Lee Oddenat a virtual conference that Vocus put together called Retweet: Engagement Means Business.  I’ve always been energized by how much there is too learn, how much to know in the world but after listening to these presentations, it struck me as overwhelming.  As a PR  and communications consultant in 2010, the possibilities for communications, as the presenters reminded us all, are enormous.  Solis and Breckenridge brought home idea that PR people should be at the forefront of customer and stakeholder engagement.  We are, after all, conversation maestros, orchestrating connection and meaningful dialogue between our clients, companies and organizations and the people they need and want to engage–customers, users,  and donors.  

Contrary to what many people believe, PR has never really been about getting news coverage but rather about getting people to understand who we are.  The traditional media was a conduit to our publics.  Now the media middle man is  less important.  With social media, we can form our own networks to disseminate information. We can all have a platform.

This great opportunity presents difficult challenges.  One in particular is how to keep up with the rapid pace of change in communications while at the same time keeping up with the developments within our clients’ industries.    With so much information, it’s hard to be a generalist anymore.   But if we become so specialized, we miss out on being able to connect the dots and see trends, patterns and connections in things that on the surface seem unrelated and unconnected.  It’s those odd connections that lead to innovation.  And that is why we should not be so focused that we miss out. 

My  wise colleague Denise Graveline said maybe we have to be  generalists in a few areas, “selective generalists.”   When I think about it, it is how I’ve worked most of my career.  It just seems harder to stay ahead of the information wave today.  Maybe I just haven’t found the right surf board to ride it.   What do you think?  Is it necessary to specialize in one area or is there still room for generalists?

Customer Service Still Lives…in Newport, RI

July 16th, 2010
Chinese Tea House at Marble House in Newport, RI

Chinese Tea House at Marble House in Newport, RI

If an interaction with a vendor is pleasant, solves a problem quickly and leaves you feeling good, it’s actually a bit of a shock these days.  But a visit to Newport, RI last week demonstrated that customer service still lives and that there are many “linchpins” who walk among us going above and beyond their specific task.   To be sure the luxurious hotel where we stayed, Vanderbilt Hall, was a textbook for how one should treat a guest.  Everything about that hotel is focused on making sure the guest feels treasured–from the wonderful spa to the front desk staff to Monty, the owner’s personable long-haired chihuahua, to colorful owner Peter de Savary to the bellman who walked us to the street to make sure we knew the way to our destination.

But the wonderful service didn’t just extend to our hotel.  Shop keepers were friendlier than most and in a neighborhood restaurant where we had breakfast The Franklin Spa, which was not a fancy place at all, the waitresses were top notch.  One, it turns out, is from my home town and we traded stories about it.

I haven’t mentioned yet the wonderful things to do in Newport: the tours of the mansions, the Newport Musical Festival, the beaches, the sailing, etc. All of these are terrific.  But I think what I will remember most was the welcoming feeling and the sense that Newporters enjoy having guests.  They wanted me to enjoy the experience.

If more businesses could figure this out and treat their customers better, it would likely build loyalty and improve the bottom line.  Does providing excellent customer service–a smile, a “can-do,” we’ll make it right attitude–cost that much?  Why don’t more businesses insist that their employees take care of the customer? What do you think?

The Case for Blogging

July 6th, 2010

Todd Defren had a great post recently on his blog PR Squared.  The post is entitled, “If You Only Do Three Things in Social Media” and one of them was blogging.   In his post, he notes that, yes blogging is hard and time consuming but very worthwhile because it encourages people to create content, respect each other by commenting and helping to make content more relevant to target audiences and it is timeless.

When I’m talking with clients about social media, blogging is one of the last things they want to do precisely because as Defren notes it’s “effin” hard.  The most worthwhile and effective things often are.   But if you really want to engage and connect with clients, customers or donors, consider starting a blog or at least following other blogs and commenting on what they say.  Social media isn’t about putting things out there and waiting for others.  It’s about participating.

Blogging isn’t for everyone and you have to make a commitment.  There is nothing worse than a blog with posts that are six months old or that are poorly written and not very interesting.  But then social media is about a commitment–to joining the conversation, adding to it, sharing information and perspctives.

Terra Cotta, Wings and Creativity: CPSI 2010 Conference

June 28th, 2010
Light House On Lake Erie

A light house helps sailors find their way to shore. Last week at the Creative Problem Solving Institute Conference in Buffalo, I found my own light house of sorts, the Osborn-Parnes (Alex Osborn and Sid Parnes–the guys who coined the word “brainstorming”) Creative Problem Solving (CPS) process.  It is a remarkable method  to approach problems and challenges in an imaginative and innovative way that leads to effective action.   It can be used within organizations or by individuals seeking to figure out a life challenge.  Quite simply, it is game changing.

There were many  “Aha’s” during the week but one of the most compelling was the use of language throughout.  The process encourages the use of nonthreatening language to ask the questions that spark meaningful discussion. Instead of defining problems in terms of “we must” or “we should,” CPS encourages us to start with “I/we wish…” or “Wouldn’t it be great if…” As we move deeper into the process, instead of saying “we’re going to do x…”, we are encouraged to ask “How would I/we…?”  “In what ways might we/I…?”  Language like this moves dialogue forward  rather than shutting it down.

Another “Aha” about the conference were the people who joined me in this remarkable journey.  People came from around the country and the globe and from a variety of disciplines.  Speakers included Gail Civille, a pioneer in advanced sensory evaluation for industry and academia, Tony Baxter from Disney Imagineering, who was responsible for Big Thunder Mountain, Splash Mountain and Disneyland Paris; and  Bernice McCarthy, an educator who developed a means for understanding differing learning styles.  Each of these speakers talked about how they continue to innovate and inspire others to be creative.  My fellow attendees included brand managers from major corporations, a doctor, market researchers, focus group moderators and consultants.

P1000684

One of Buffalo's greatest creations - wings

No trip to Buffalo would be complete without a visit to Louis Sullivan’s terra cotta clad Guaranty Building, one of the earliest steel framed skyscrapers in the US,and to the Anchor Bar, where Buffalo Wings were born   Both the building and the wings are a testament to the creativity and imagination of the human mind. Long live creativity and a toast to Osborn and Parnes for helping to unleash it.

Starting the Conversation in the Right Place

June 26th, 2010

If you don’tknow where you are going, you’ll certainly never get there.  But all too often when we seek  engage others either to buy or use a product or to embrace our cause or point of view, we start the conversation in the wrong place and we never end up making the kind of connection we are expecting.  Last week, while attending The Creative Problem Solving Institute in Buffalo, New York, I was reminded about how important it is to make sure you are asking the right questions when seeking to solve problems or engender innovative thinking.  But this process holds true for how companies and organizations communicate with their audiences.   It’s critical to identify the real issue (s) that matter to your audience and how interacting with you, your ideas or products helps or hinders them.

The next time you are planning to start a conversation with your publics either in the form of a new product release or new campaign, take the time to understand what it is you are truly delivering to your audience.   There are lots of tools out there to help you do this (including the CPS process that was the focus of the conference last weekand more on that in future posts). I am haunted by something Guy Kawaski, entrepreneur and venture capitalist once said,” If I were in the  refrigeration business, iI wouldn’t be looking at the next cooling coil.  I’d be looking at bio-tech because the real issue is preserving food. “  It’s easy to jump to tactics because thinking through what you are really doing and are all about are difficult tasks.  But if you don’t, you won’t get  far,  or worse you’ll never get there at all.

Beware the Overtweeter!

June 16th, 2010

Lately, there are some folks who make me feel like I’ve just finished a heavy Thanksgiving meal.  These are the overtweeters: people who just gobble your attention and leave you feeling stuffed but unsatisfied.   It’s too bad because a great deal of what they have to say, some of the time, is useful.  They just don’t know when to stop.

Take Guy Kawasaki.  I’ve always admired his work and so followed him on Twitter.  But after a short time, I had to hit the unfollow button.  He [or rather his minions] were sending 6 or seven tweets an hour and most of them promoting his new venture, which I won’t mention here because I don’t want to promote it.  Many of these tweets were compelling but I was drowning in them.  They were also crowding out other voices that I wanted to make sure I heard. Problogger is another one.  I stopped following his tweets but I do read his excellent  blog

Like eating, tweeting or any other means of communications is best done in moderation.  You don’t want to exhaust or bore your audience.   Speak when you have something to say and when you don’t, remember that silence can be golden.

All Tweeted Out?

June 9th, 2010

whale_errorI just logged into my Twitter account and was greeted by this happy whale with the message that “Twitter was over capacity. Too many Tweets.”   I give Twitter credit.  They didn’t take a doom and gloom approach to being out of service.  They told the truth — what choice did they have — and used a colorful impage to illustrate their point. 

But it did make me wonder what was the tweet that was too much.  Was it about BPStephen Strasburg’s phenomenal debut with the Washington Nationals,  The Gore split? 

We have so much to talk about and yet so much of what we talk about it silly or inane.  We often don’t really act on fixing the hard issues but we sure like to talk about them and now with social media platforms, we have more ways to talk.  I’d like to see more action.  What about you?

A Spot on the Communicators Wall of Shame

June 4th, 2010

BP’s Tony Hayward doesn’t get it.    His words are a like a giant oil spill themselves, coating the media waters with arrogance, stupidity and leaving the impression that no one really is taking charge of this extraordinary catastrophe. A New York Times article today suggests that he’ll probably be fired before this is all over.  The article recaps some of Tony’s greatest PR hits–the spill is modest  because  the Gulf of Mexico ““is a very big ocean” and “the environmental impact of this disaster is likely to have been very, very modest. “  He also was quoted as having said that he wanted his life back. He had to apologize this week to the families of the men who were killed on the oil rig.

The article pointed out that he is a geologist.  Scientists aren’t always the best communicators but that is no excuse.  If the person at the top can’t articulate the company’s positions and isn’t a good communicator, he or she shouldn’t be CEO.  The ability to communicate clearly is as important a skill as financial acumen and product expertise.  It’s vital to the bottom line. And if you have a CEO who isn’t a good communicator, put another senior manager out front who is. BP has hired a crisis firm and a new person to manage their PR.  But just like the oil spill itself, the clean-up to repair the damage will take years.

So in the face of all of this, Tony Hayward is the first name to go on our Communicators Wall of Shame.

Can You Tweet For Me?

June 1st, 2010

Not too long ago, I was approached by a potential client looking for a PR firm to increase its visibility among target audiences.  The first question they asked was “So Can you Tweet for me? We need to be on Twitter?”  They might need to be but in my view that was the wrong question.  What needs to be asked first are two basic questions:  Who are you trying to reach and why?

I love Twitter but just like hope alone is not a strategy neither is Twitter or any other social media platform by itself a communications strategy.  Facebook, Twitter and others are tools to help you engage clients not ends.   As you contemplate your use of social media, consider this:

1) How do the people you want to reach get information and communicate?

2) Do you know how people would like to get information and communications from you?

3) Are you prepared to tailor your communications to your audience and to the platform you are using?

4) What is the appropriate mix of the various communications tools and strategies available: blogging, Twitter, FB, traditional media, advertising, direct outreach, etc.?

5) What is it you are trying to get across and why does it or should it matter to your audience(s)?

These are basic and fundamental questions.  The way we communicate continues to change but the basic human reasons we choose to engage others really haven’t.